Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adrian Oetzbach vs Niels Visker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Oetzbach vs Visker analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Adrian Oetzbach vs Niels Visker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Oetzbach 0 - 0 Visker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Oetzbach has won 44.54% of points on their second serve, while Visker has won 52.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Oetzbach, in recent form, has won 53.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Visker has won 48.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.66% and 30.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Oetzbach has saved 52.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Visker has saved 69.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Oetzbach has won 60% of matches played (W/L 63/ 42), with Visker winning 61.54% (W/L 48/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Oetzbach has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 66/ 44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Visker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 43/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 71/ 46).
- Player level: In the last year, Oetzbach has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.86% of matches (W/L 60/ 37), where as Visker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.33% of matches (W/L 46/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Oetzbach has played against opponents with an average rank of 109.11 while Visker has played against players with an average rank of 148.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Oetzbach has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Visker has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Oetzbach has converted 42.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Visker has converted 42.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
516
Rank
516
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
583
Rank
583
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
55% (222-179)
Career Total W/L
63% (121-70)
51% (23-22)
YTD W/L
66% (27-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Adrian Oetzbach vs Niels Visker For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Oetzbach VS Visker
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adrian Oetzbach | Niels Visker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 51% (23/22) | 66% (27/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (52/52) | 64% (58/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (484/477) | 54% (469/405) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (17/15) | 62% (13/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 67% (6/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.63 |
| Aces Total | 115 | 269 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 196 | 90 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:5 | 1:25:58 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 124.76 | 130.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1787/2978) | 63% (1648/2630) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1201/1787) | 74% (1223/1648) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (530/1190) | 53% (517/981) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (148/348) | 42% (90/213) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1309/3078) | 37% (943/2540) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (21/18) | 66% (27/14) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 51% (23/45) | 65% (26/40) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 71% (10/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (8/14) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (24/21) | 90% (30/27) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (24/3) | 10% (30/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (21/2) | 0% (11/0) |
Adrian Oetzbach Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Mika Lipp
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Daniel De Jonge
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
5
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
33%
(
13 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Lodewijk Weststrate
57%
(
72 of
127)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
117)
11
Aces
9
12
Double Faults
6
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
35%
(
44 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
118)
121
Total Points Won
123
|
7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milan Welte
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Sebastian Grundtvig
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
42%
(
18 of
43)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Niels Visker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Vincent Marysko
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mika Lipp
Player
Niels Visker
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Stian Klaassen
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Bogdan Bobrov
61%
(
60 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Giuseppe Tresca
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Sebastian Prechtel
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Lootsma
Player
Niels Visker
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
5
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Oetzbach Vs Visker Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Oetzbach are available here and Visker photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Adrian Oetzbach
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Niels Visker
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
